YOUTUBE · CHANNEL COMPARISONPreview

Sidemen vs Beta SquadTwo group channels. Different games to follow.

Sidemen and Beta Squad both turn a group into the center of a YouTube video. This page first compares the size of their main channels, then uses visible upload examples to examine the rules, situations and recurring formats in their titles.

Account counts checked Oct 28, 2026 · Public data and source records

Main channels @Sidemen and @BetaSquad only. MoreSidemen, SidemenReacts, Side+, Beta Squad Shorts and members’ personal accounts are excluded. The current counters and history window are dated below.

Sidemen ↗

@sidemen · Main channel

LEADING

PUBLIC YOUTUBE SUBSCRIBERS

23,400,000
8.12B lifetime views517 public videos

Checked 2026-10-28 02:46:57 UTC · Source record ↗

Beta Squad ↗

@betasquad · Main channel

PUBLIC YOUTUBE SUBSCRIBERS

12,100,000
2.11B lifetime views204 public videos

Checked 2026-10-28 02:46:33 UTC · Source record ↗

VS
THE REPORTED SUBSCRIBER GAP11,300,000

Sidemen leads by approximately 11.3M subscribers in these dated public observations.

YouTube subscriber totals are rounded. Each source has its own retrieval time; these are dated observations, not a simultaneous live counter.

THE SAME METRICS ON BOTH SIDES

Subscribers, views and the size of the catalog.

MetricSidemenBeta Squad
Public subscribers · rounded23,400,00012,100,000
Lifetime channel views8,120,279,5512,113,139,220
Public video count517204
Lifetime views / public video · catalog ratio15.71M10.36M
Current counter checked (UTC)2026-10-28 02:46:57 UTC2026-10-28 02:46:33 UTC
Paired recorded subscriber change00
Paired recorded view change51,894,90531,752,291

The catalog ratio is lifetime channel views divided by the current public upload count. It is not a median, a new-video forecast or a count of unique viewers. Recorded changes below use a separate historical window.

THE RACE, OVER TIME

Daily counts with source records.

Last 30 days · Daily records

Showing 30 saved daily records · 2026-09-28 to 2026-10-27 (provider date labels). Growth is measured from the first record in this period.

Source: SocialCounts reported daily history, captured Oct 28, 2026. Both channels use the same provider and matching date labels; the retrieval day is excluded. The provider supplies dates without a timezone or per-day capture time. These are third-party channel totals, not owner Analytics or live-counter estimates. Repeated values are retained; no missing counts are filled.

Change in saved view counts since Sep 28. Each value is the difference between saved cumulative counts; this is not a live counter.

Oct 27Sidemen 51.89MBeta Squad 31.75M
014.53M29.06M43.59M58.12MSep 28Oct 13Oct 27

Hover or touch the chart to inspect a date. Keyboard: ← / →, Home / End.

History retrieved 2026-10-28 03:03:13 UTC · SocialCounts reported historySidemen source JSON ↗Beta Squad source JSON ↗

Latest archive: 2026-10-27 (provider date labels). Each dot has a saved source record. Lines connect saved observations, including across missing dates; no counts are added for those dates. Rounded subscriber counts can stay flat while the channel gains subscribers.

30 paired saved dates, Sep 28, 2026 to Oct 27, 2026. The current counter cards were checked separately and are not silently added to the historical line.

Go beyond the counters and investigate the content.

Research with Kabo Agent →
READING THE CONTENT

The group is familiar; the setup makes each episode distinct.

01

Compare the group channels, not their combined networks.

The subscriber cards count one main channel per group. They do not add the members’ personal channels or paid products. Adding those audiences would count some people more than once and make the two sides depend on arbitrary inclusion rules. Lifetime views and public upload counts describe these particular catalogs. Total views divided by video count is supplied as a catalog ratio, not the view count a typical new upload should achieve.

02

Sidemen’s recent titles make a constraint easy to explain.

The latest-tab sample includes travelling for 24 hours in one direction, a £2,000 car challenge and a last-to-leave restaurant challenge. Each title gives the group a concrete situation, budget or rule. That creates a clear question for a prospective viewer before they click. This is evidence about the packaging visible on the channel page, not a claim about unseen scenes, production decisions or what caused the final view count.

03

Beta Squad’s sample includes recurring social-game formats.

Mafia, murder mystery and last-to-leave titles appear in the saved sample, alongside a mukbang and a grocery-store challenge. The named game tells the viewer what sort of episode to expect while participants and setting can vary. The public sample supports that observation; it does not establish retention, chemistry or audience overlap. The channel trend separately uses matching SocialCounts date labels within the displayed window for both groups. Its recorded changes describe this specific interval, not retention or the performance of any one episode.

VISIBLE UPLOADS · TITLE AND FORMAT CONTEXT

What do the channels actually put in front of viewers?

Six first-visible entries from each channel’s Videos tab in Latest order, checked Oct 28, 2026. This selection excludes separate Shorts and Live tabs. Views and relative ages are retained as displayed; these are cumulative counts at different ages, not a fair launch-performance ranking.

SOURCES & LIMITATIONS

Know what each number can answer.

Are MoreSidemen and personal channels included?

No. The page compares only the linked Sidemen and Beta Squad main channels. Related channels and paid services are excluded.

Which group has more subscribers?

Use the dated public subscriber cards above. This is a channel comparison, not a count of unique fans across the groups’ networks.

How is the recorded growth compared?

The chart subtracts the first saved SocialCounts total from subsequent totals, using the same available date labels for both channels. No values are added for missing dates; the source does not specify a daily timezone.

Dated public counts

Current counts come from the linked public-data envelopes or the official YouTube About panels. Both include retrieval times. A saved text capture preserves what was visible; it is separate from the historical archive.

Saved history, with its limits

Both historical series come from SocialCounts’ reported daily channel totals. Original JSON responses, retrieval times, provider dates and SHA256 checksums are saved. A date label is not a precise observation time: the source does not specify its daily timezone. Repeated totals can reflect reporting or caching; these differences are not YouTube Analytics daily-view reports.

No private audience claims

YouTube’s public channel statistics do not provide private retention, watch time, revenue, unique viewers or audience overlap. None is inferred from the counters or titles here.

Inspect historical coverage and source dates

Sidemen · 30 historical observations

Provider dateSubscribersTotal viewsSource
2026-09-2823,400,0008,066,186,983JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-09-2923,400,0008,066,186,983JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-09-3023,400,0008,070,262,123JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0123,400,0008,073,313,425JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0223,400,0008,074,973,119JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0323,400,0008,076,357,831JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0423,400,0008,077,610,509JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0523,400,0008,078,899,933JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0623,400,0008,081,846,471JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0723,400,0008,084,419,930JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0823,400,0008,086,327,898JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0923,400,0008,087,944,351JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1023,400,0008,088,892,681JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1123,400,0008,090,417,967JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1223,400,0008,091,526,421JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1323,400,0008,092,457,437JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1423,400,0008,097,560,733JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1523,400,0008,098,219,495JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1623,400,0008,100,615,592JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1723,400,0008,102,248,145JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1823,400,0008,103,346,974JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1923,400,0008,104,441,931JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2023,400,0008,106,713,793JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2123,400,0008,108,053,539JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2223,400,0008,109,557,078JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2323,400,0008,112,461,978JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2423,400,0008,113,379,848JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2523,400,0008,114,402,817JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2623,400,0008,115,326,906JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2723,400,0008,118,081,888JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗

Beta Squad · 30 historical observations

Provider dateSubscribersTotal viewsSource
2026-09-2812,100,0002,078,459,413JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-09-2912,100,0002,079,094,337JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-09-3012,100,0002,079,348,047JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0112,100,0002,080,198,244JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0212,100,0002,080,734,601JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0312,100,0002,081,266,054JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0412,100,0002,081,816,289JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0512,100,0002,082,392,983JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0612,100,0002,082,984,638JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0712,100,0002,083,494,500JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0812,100,0002,084,043,508JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-0912,100,0002,084,588,228JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1012,100,0002,084,951,472JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1112,100,0002,085,605,400JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1212,100,0002,086,929,467JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1312,100,0002,088,072,520JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1412,100,0002,089,110,614JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1512,100,0002,089,361,468JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1612,100,0002,090,277,945JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1712,100,0002,091,006,887JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1812,100,0002,091,608,677JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-1912,100,0002,092,253,274JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2012,100,0002,096,406,070JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2112,100,0002,097,400,648JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2212,100,0002,098,586,455JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2312,100,0002,101,616,084JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2412,100,0002,102,851,034JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2512,100,0002,104,350,696JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2612,100,0002,107,543,344JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
2026-10-2712,100,0002,110,211,704JSON ↗ · Provider history ↗
TURN THE COMPARISON INTO YOUR NEXT QUESTION

Research the ideas behind the numbers.

Use Kabo Agent to investigate creators, compare content patterns and build a source-backed brief for your own channel.

Try: “Compare the Sidemen and Beta Squad main YouTube channels. Keep secondary channels separate and examine constraints, social games and recurring series using dated source examples.”

Research with Kabo Agent →Explore Kabo Agent ↗
CONTINUE EXPLORING

More comparisons.